AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 706 MHz
681.2x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
2.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5200 MHz
2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29471 vs 14510
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 617 vs 210
Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5996 vs 4432

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 5 January 2013
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 706 MHz
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 5200 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	29471 vs 14510
PassMark - G2D Mark	617 vs 210
PassMark - G3D Mark	5996 vs 4432

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Around 95% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 1280
Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8319 vs 7730
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8319 vs 7730
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3595
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3595
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3350
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3350

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2496 vs 1280
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8319 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8319 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7337 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7337 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10873 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10873 vs 3350

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29471

14510

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

10873

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

10873

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

617

210

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5996

4432

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Geekbench - OpenCL	29471	14510
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	10873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	10873
PassMark - G2D Mark	617	210
PassMark - G3D Mark	5996	4432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		250.291

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Navi 14	GK110
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	5 January 2013
Place in performance rating	354	408
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,199
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz
Compute units	20
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	2496
Pixel fill rate	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s	146.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		3,524 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	5200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5