AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 994x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48365 vs 42289
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 6 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48365 vs 42289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 9.9x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 10296
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 10296
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 687
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11654 vs 9313
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 10296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 10296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 687 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11654 vs 9313 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48365 | 42289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 | 827 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 | 11654 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 12 | GP104 |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 6 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 271 | 275 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
Price now | $799.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | 7604 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |