AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 10140
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 10140
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 343
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9313 vs 8366
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 vs 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 vs 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 vs 343 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 vs 8366 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 164.8 GTexel/s
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 48379
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s vs 164.8 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 vs 48379 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 48379 | 68305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 | 343 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 | 8366 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 12 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 271 | 325 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 175.0 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | 11.20 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | 5.599 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | 77.76 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 175.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
