AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3678 vs 1579
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 408
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17562 vs 8803
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 48.494 vs 25.891
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 679.583 vs 365.4
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.96 vs 2.104
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 62.405 vs 37.17
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 vs 132.07
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5367 vs 1514
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2495 vs 2433
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5367 vs 1514
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2495 vs 2433
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 13 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 vs 1579 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17562 vs 8803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 vs 25.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 vs 365.4 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 vs 2.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 vs 37.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 vs 132.07 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 vs 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 vs 2433 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3351
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3351
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | 1579 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17562 | 8803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | 25.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | 365.4 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | 2.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | 37.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | 132.07 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 6729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 6729 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Owl |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 13 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 546 | 932 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 4,940 million |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |