AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 345

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 1004 MHz
• Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5320 vs 3678
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19914 vs 17562
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.188 vs 48.494
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 679.583
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 3.96
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 62.405
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 247.728
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 5367
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 vs 2495
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 5367
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 vs 2495

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3678 5320
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	711 345
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17562 19914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.494 54.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	679.583 1159.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.96 5.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.405 82.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.728 293.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5367 8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2495 3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5367 8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2495 3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3358

Compare specifications (specs)