AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1105 MHz vs 941 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 112.0 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 384
- 5x better floating-point performance: 3,584 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 8.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6337 vs 782
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 247
- Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30300 vs 15796
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 27 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 vs 782 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 vs 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30300 vs 15796 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | NVIDIA GeForce 825M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | 782 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30300 | 15796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 570 | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GK208 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 27 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 421 | 790 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | 941 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s | 30.11 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1300 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |