AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 444
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30300 vs 29363
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 vs 19.803
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 15 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 vs 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30300 vs 29363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 vs 19.803 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1105 MHz
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 112.0 GTexel / s
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 3,584 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6800 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 6337
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 74.958
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 vs 1070.209
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 6.94
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 436.958
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 7664
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 vs 2340
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 7664
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 vs 2340
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1105 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 112.0 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 3,584 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 6337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 vs 74.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 vs 1070.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 vs 6.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 vs 436.958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | 8161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30300 | 29363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3666 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP106B |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 421 | 401 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | 4,275 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,400 million |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |