AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 vs 511.984
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 6780 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 vs 511.984 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 140.8 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- Around 37% better floating-point performance: 6,175 gflops vs 4,506 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40234 vs 34797
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 109.521 vs 86.154
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1206.829 vs 1090.128
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.88 vs 7.88
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 98.349
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10113 vs 9613
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2900 vs 2814
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10113 vs 9613
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2900 vs 2814
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1096 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s vs 140.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops vs 4,506 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40234 vs 34797 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 vs 86.154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 vs 1090.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 vs 7.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 vs 98.349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 vs 9613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2900 vs 2814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 vs 9613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2900 vs 2814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34797 | 40234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | 117.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 496 | 330 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | 6,175 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s | 193.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 256.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |