AMD Radeon Pro 575 versus AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon Pro 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 versus 511.984
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz versus 6780 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 versus 511.984 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 193.0 GTexel / s versus 140.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 2048
- Environ 37% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,175 gflops versus 4,506 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 40234 versus 34797
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 109.521 versus 86.154
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1206.829 versus 1090.128
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.88 versus 7.88
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 versus 98.349
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10113 versus 9613
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2900 versus 2814
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10113 versus 9613
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2900 versus 2814
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 1096 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 193.0 GTexel / s versus 140.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 6,175 gflops versus 4,506 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40234 versus 34797 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 versus 86.154 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 versus 1090.128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 versus 7.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 versus 98.349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 versus 9613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2900 versus 2814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 versus 9613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2900 versus 2814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34797 | 40234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | 109.521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | 1206.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | 9.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | 117.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | 511.984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | 10113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | 10113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 496 | 330 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,506 gflops | 6,175 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.8 GTexel / s | 193.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 217.6 GB / s | 256.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 575 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
ATIFireGL V3300
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X
