AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 14.1x more texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
  • 64x more pipelines: 2048 vs 32
  • 56.3x better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 80 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
  • 8.5x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 800 MHz
Launch date 5 June 2017 vs 13 March 2008
Texture fill rate 140.8 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2048 vs 32
Floating-point performance 4,506 gflops vs 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 6800 MHz vs 800 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1096 MHz
  • 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 120 Watt
Core clock speed 1250 MHz vs 1096 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 29 Watt vs 120 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

Name AMD Radeon Pro 575 NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
Geekbench - OpenCL 34757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 86.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1090.128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 98.349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 539.686
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9613
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9613
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352
PassMark - G3D Mark 270
PassMark - G2D Mark 328

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 575 NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Tesla
Code name Polaris 20 G84
Launch date 5 June 2017 13 March 2008
Place in performance rating 486 485
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 1096 MHz 1250 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,506 gflops 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 80 nm
Pipelines 2048 32
Texture fill rate 140.8 GTexel / s 10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt 29 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 289 million
CUDA cores 32

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 217.6 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6800 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR2?, GDDR3
Shared memory 0