NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7852 vs 4809
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39085 vs 22421
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 8870
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 8870
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7852 vs 4809 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39085 vs 22421 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 8870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 8870 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Around 92% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 466
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3586 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2238
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3586 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 vs 466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7852 | 4809 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 | 585 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39085 | 22421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 8870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 8870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Vega 12 |
| Place in performance rating | 370 | 367 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch date | 14 November 2018 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 2400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro S9050
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
IntelArc A570M
