NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

  • 2.9x more core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1190 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7810 vs 4809
  • Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39363 vs 22421
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 8870
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 8870
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 855 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1425 MHz vs 1190 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7810 vs 4809
Geekbench - OpenCL 39363 vs 22421
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9851 vs 8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9851 vs 8870

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

  • Around 92% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
  • Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 468
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3586 vs 2476
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2238
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3586 vs 2476
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2238
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 585 vs 468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3586 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 2238
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3586 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7810
4809
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
468
585
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39363
22421
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9851
8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2476
3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2238
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9851
8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2476
3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2238
3359
Name NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
PassMark - G3D Mark 7810 4809
PassMark - G2D Mark 468 585
Geekbench - OpenCL 39363 22421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 157.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1934.012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 136.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 684.333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9851 8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2476 3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2238 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9851 8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2476 3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2238 3359

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU117 Vega 12
Place in performance rating 369 368
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch date 14 November 2018

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1425 MHz 1190 MHz
Core clock speed 855 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.918 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024
Pixel fill rate 45.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 91.20 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) 2400 MHz
Memory type GDDR6