AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8870 vs 8319
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8870 vs 8319
  • Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22421 vs 14510
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 210
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4809 vs 4432
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 14 November 2018 vs 5 January 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8870 vs 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8870 vs 8319
Geekbench - OpenCL 22421 vs 14510
PassMark - G2D Mark 585 vs 210
PassMark - G3D Mark 4809 vs 4432

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2.2x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 2400 MHz
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3586
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3586
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3359
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3359
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7337 vs 3586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7337 vs 3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10873 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10873 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8870
8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8870
8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3586
7337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3586
7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
10873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
10873
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
22421
14510
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
585
210
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4809
4432
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 NVIDIA Tesla K20m
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8870 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8870 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3586 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3586 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 10873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 10873
Geekbench - OpenCL 22421 14510
PassMark - G2D Mark 585 210
PassMark - G3D Mark 4809 4432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 250.291

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Kepler
Code name Vega 12 GK110
Launch date 14 November 2018 5 January 2013
Place in performance rating 360 408
Type Workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $3,199

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1190 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 225 Watt
Floating-point performance 3,524 gflops
Pipelines 2496
Texture fill rate 146.8 GTexel / s
Transistor count 7,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory clock speed 2400 MHz 5200 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB
Memory bandwidth 208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 320 Bit
Memory type GDDR5