AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8870 vs 8319
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8870 vs 8319
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22421 vs 14510
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 210
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4809 vs 4432
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 5 January 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 vs 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 vs 8319 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 vs 14510 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 vs 210 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 vs 4432 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3586
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3586
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3359
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10873 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10873 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 10873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 10873 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 | 14510 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 | 210 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 | 4432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.89 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.291 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Vega 12 | GK110 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 5 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 360 | 408 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2496 | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |