AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 875.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 691
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53770 vs 40181
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3715
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3354
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3715
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3354
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 5 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 691 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53770 vs 40181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- 50x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 12500 million
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- 8.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11872 vs 11300
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 11925
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 11925
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 12500 million |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11872 vs 11300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 vs 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 vs 11925 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 11872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 691 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53770 | 40181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Greenland | GM200 |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 5 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 236 | 239 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 988 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |