AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 988 MHz
  • Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1114 MHz
  • 875.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 691
  • Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53770 vs 40181
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3715
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3354
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3715
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3354
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 19 March 2019 vs 5 March 2016
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 988 MHz
Boost clock speed 1300 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate 249.6 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 784 vs 691
Geekbench - OpenCL 53770 vs 40181
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3947 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10411 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3947 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10411 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

  • 50x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 12500 million
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
  • 8.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11883 vs 11300
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 11925
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 11925
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 12500 million
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 11883 vs 11300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13107 vs 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13107 vs 11925

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11300
11883
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
784
691
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
53770
40181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11925
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3947
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10411
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11925
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3947
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10411
3354
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark 11300 11883
PassMark - G2D Mark 784 691
Geekbench - OpenCL 53770 40181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 135.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3063.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 883.876
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11925 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3947 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10411 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11925 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3947 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10411 3354

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Essentials

Architecture Vega 10 PRO Maxwell 2.0
Code name Greenland GM200
GCN generation GCN 5.0
Launch date 19 March 2019 5 March 2016
Place in performance rating 237 239
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $4,999

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz 1114 MHz
Core clock speed 1200 MHz 988 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 499.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.97 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 3072
Pixel fill rate 83.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 249.6 GTexel/s 285.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 12500 million 250 Watt
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops
Transistor count 8,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 402.4 GB/s 317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) 6612 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5

Technologies

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)