AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 988 MHz
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1114 MHz
• 875.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 695
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53445 vs 39431
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3715
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3354
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3715
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

• 50x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 12500 million
• 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
• 8.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11869 vs 11300
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 11925
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 11925

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11300 11869
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	784 695
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53445 39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11925 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3947 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10411 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11925 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3947 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10411 3354

Compare specifications (specs)