AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 928.6x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 9576
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 vs 12.49
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 857.575
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 8673
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3361
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 8673
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3361
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 24 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 vs 9576 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 vs 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 vs 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3361 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- 45.5x lower typical power consumption: 275 Watt vs 12500 million
- Around 34% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 784
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 vs 135.416
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 3063.269
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3947
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3947
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt vs 12500 million |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 vs 784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 vs 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 vs 3063.269 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 3947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 3947 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 9576 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53770 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Greenland | Fiji |
| GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 236 | 237 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 275 Watt |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Transistor count | 8,900 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 191 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
