AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 928.6x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 9580
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 vs 12.49
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 857.575
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 8673
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3361
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 8673
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3361
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 24 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 vs 9580 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 vs 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 vs 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3361 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- 45.5x lower typical power consumption: 275 Watt vs 12500 million
- Around 34% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 784
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 vs 135.416
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 3063.269
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3947
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3947
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt vs 12500 million |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 799 vs 784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 vs 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 vs 3063.269 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 3947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 3947 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 9580 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 799 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53780 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Greenland | Fiji |
| GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 237 | 235 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 275 Watt |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Transistor count | 8,900 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 191 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
