AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 928.6x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 9580
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 vs 12.49
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 857.575
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 8673
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3361
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 8673
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 24 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 vs 9580 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 vs 12.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 vs 857.575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3361 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- 45.5x lower typical power consumption: 275 Watt vs 12500 million
- Around 34% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 784
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 vs 135.416
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 3063.269
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3947
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3947
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt vs 12500 million |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 799 vs 784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 vs 135.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 vs 3063.269 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 3947 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 9580 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 799 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53770 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 155.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 3431.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 12.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 857.575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Greenland | Fiji |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 237 | 236 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 275 Watt |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 191 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |