AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 1414.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 9934
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 427
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53770 vs 41185
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 2293.496
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 692.9
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 8048
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 8048

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1379 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• 108.7x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 12500 million
• 10.2x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 135.416
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 11925
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3947
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 11925
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3947

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11300 9934
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	784 427
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53770 41185
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.416 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3063.269 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.678 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	883.876 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11925 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3947 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10411 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11925 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3947 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10411 8048

Compare specifications (specs)