AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 1414.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 9937
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 428
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53770 vs 41185
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 2293.496
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 692.9
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 8048
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 8048
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 vs 9937 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 428 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53770 vs 41185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 vs 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 vs 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 8048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 8048 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1379 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 108.7x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 12500 million
- 10.2x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 135.416
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 11925
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3947
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 11925
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3947
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1379 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 12500 million |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 vs 135.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 vs 12.678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 vs 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 vs 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 vs 3947 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 9937 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 428 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53770 | 41185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 214.123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 12.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 8902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 8048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 8902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 8048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | Pascal |
Code name | Greenland | GP104 |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 237 | 234 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1379 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 115 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |