AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 657.4x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 2513.321
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 10966
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3686
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3343
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 10966
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3686
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
• 50x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 12500 million
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• 14.5x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 11300
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 784
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72404 vs 53864
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 vs 135.416
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.708 vs 12.678
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1139.382 vs 883.876

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11300 17881
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	784 934
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53864 72404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.416 256.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3063.269 2513.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.678 19.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	883.876 1139.382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11925 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3947 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10411 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11925 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3947 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10411 3343

Compare specifications (specs)