AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 345.6 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 11,059 gflops vs 8,873 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 vs 12572
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 671
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71257 vs 52761
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 vs 927.006
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3077
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3077
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 1 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 345.6 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops vs 8,873 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 vs 12572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 671 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71257 vs 52761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 vs 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3077 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 vs 142.691
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 vs 1729.558
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 vs 12.693
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 vs 111.376
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 13339
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 13339
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 vs 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 vs 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 vs 12.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 vs 111.376 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 vs 13339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 | 12572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 671 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71257 | 52761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 10 | GP104 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 243 | 244 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $1,699.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 345.6 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |