AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 versus NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 345.6 GTexel / s versus 277.3 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 2048
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,059 gflops versus 8,873 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 versus 12585
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 versus 673
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71298 versus 52705
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 versus 927.006
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3077
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3077
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 1 October 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 345.6 GTexel / s versus 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops versus 8,873 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 versus 12585 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 versus 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71298 versus 52705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 versus 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3077 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 5.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 1572 MHz
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 versus 142.691
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 versus 1729.558
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 versus 12.693
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 versus 111.376
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 versus 13339
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 versus 13339
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 1572 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 versus 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 versus 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 versus 12.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 versus 111.376 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 versus 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 versus 13339 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 | 12585 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71298 | 52705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 241 | 244 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Prix maintenant | $1,699.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1350 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1250 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 345.6 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |