AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 974.4x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 695
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15222 vs 11869
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69154 vs 39431
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 5 March 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 988 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 695 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 vs 11869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69154 vs 39431 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 11065
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 11065
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 vs 11065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 695 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 | 11869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69154 | 39431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 13107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 5 March 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $4,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 193 | 233 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 988 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 8,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
