AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1227 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1647 MHz
- 2022.6x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 103
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 103
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 525
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15222 vs 10579
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69098 vs 34875
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1227 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1647 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 103 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 525 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 vs 10579 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69098 vs 34875 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 11065
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 11065
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 vs 11065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 103 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 525 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 | 10579 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69098 | 34875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 16345 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Place in performance rating | 194 | 286 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1647 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1227 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
