AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 705
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15222 vs 14832
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3346 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 vs 14832 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 277.9 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 205 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 11065
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 11065
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 277.9 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 11065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3346 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 | 14832 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69418 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 19565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 19565 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Place in performance rating | 193 | 175 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 296.6 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | 18.98 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | 9.492 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 296.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
