AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective)
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 14 May 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 609.1 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
- 3.9x more pipelines: 6912 vs 1792
- 5x more maximum memory size: 40 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21006 vs 20826
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21006 vs 20826
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 27823 vs 15778
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 27823 vs 15778
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 51880 vs 42325
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 51880 vs 42325
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 201255 vs 70380
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6912 vs 1792 |
| Maximum memory size | 40 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21006 vs 20826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21006 vs 20826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 vs 15778 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 vs 15778 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 vs 42325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 vs 42325 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 201255 vs 70380 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1023 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15863 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 21006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 21006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 27823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 27823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 51880 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 51880 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70380 | 201255 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 23 | GA100 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 14 May 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Place in performance rating | 38 | 12 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 9.746 TFLOPS (1:2) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 19.49 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 6912 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 225.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 609.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 54200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | IGP |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 800 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 40 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 1555 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 5120 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2e |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIARTX A4500
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIARTX A5500
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700 XT
