AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 69% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 13566
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 31930
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 13566
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 31930
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 vs 13566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 vs 31930 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 vs 13566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 vs 31930 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- 3.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 1792
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 15383
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 947
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 73128
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 270.025
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 4980.223
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 20.735
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 135.303
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 1054.582
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 20826
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 20826
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 5888 vs 1792 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 15383 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 947 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 73128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 270.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 4980.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 20.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 135.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 1054.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 20826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 20826 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15383 | 22253 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 947 | 999 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73128 | 123479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 453.922 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | 5803.174 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 40.757 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 182.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 1664.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 31716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 13566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 31930 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 31716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 13566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 31930 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 23 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $499 |
| Place in performance rating | 63 | 44 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 5888 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |