AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA RTX A6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 51% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1455 MHz
  • Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1860 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 300 Watt
  • 11.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1023 vs 86
  • 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15863 vs 4237
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 3712
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 3712
  • 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 3353
  • 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 vs 5 Oct 2020
Core clock speed 2200 MHz vs 1455 MHz
Boost clock speed 2903 MHz vs 1860 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 8 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt vs 300 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 1023 vs 86
PassMark - G3D Mark 15863 vs 4237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 15778 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 15778 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 42325 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 42325 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000

  • Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
  • 6x more pipelines: 10752 vs 1792
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 vs 20826
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 vs 20826
  • 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 vs 70380
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 625.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
Pipelines 10752 vs 1792
Maximum memory size 48 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 23142 vs 20826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 23142 vs 20826
Geekbench - OpenCL 200330 vs 70380

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A6000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1023
86
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15863
4237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20826
23142
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20826
23142
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15778
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15778
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42325
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42325
3353
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
70380
200330
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6600 NVIDIA RTX A6000
PassMark - G2D Mark 1023 86
PassMark - G3D Mark 15863 4237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20826 23142
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20826 23142
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 15778 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 15778 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 42325 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 42325 3353
Geekbench - OpenCL 70380 200330
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 737.53
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 59.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 189.702
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2347.314
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 17833

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 NVIDIA RTX A6000

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ampere
Code name Navi 23 GA102
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 5 Oct 2020
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $4649
Place in performance rating 38 94

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2903 MHz 1860 MHz
Compute units 28
Core clock speed 2200 MHz 1455 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) 1250 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 10.40 TFLOPS 40.00 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1792 10752
Pixel fill rate 185.8 GPixel/s 208.3 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s 625.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt 300 Watt
Transistor count 11060 million 28300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Single-slot Dual-slot
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 241 mm (9.5 inches) 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 300 Watt 700 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 8-pin EPS
Width 112 mm (4.4 inches)

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.2
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 768 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6