AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA RTX A6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1860 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 11.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1023 vs 86
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15863 vs 4237
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 3712
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 3712
- 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 3353
- 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 5 Oct 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1860 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1023 vs 86 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15863 vs 4237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
- 6x more pipelines: 10752 vs 1792
- 6x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 vs 20826
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 vs 20826
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 vs 70380
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 625.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10752 vs 1792 |
Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 vs 20826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 vs 20826 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 vs 70380 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A6000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA RTX A6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1023 | 86 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15863 | 4237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 3353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70380 | 200330 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 23 | GA102 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 5 Oct 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $4649 |
Place in performance rating | 38 | 94 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1860 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 40.00 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1792 | 10752 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 208.3 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 625.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin EPS |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 48 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |