AMD Radeon Pro W6600 versus NVIDIA RTX A6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA RTX A6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 2200 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 56% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2903 MHz versus 1860 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15383 versus 4237
- 11x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 947 versus 86
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 versus 3712
- 12.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 versus 3353
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 versus 3712
- 12.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 Jun 2021 versus 5 Oct 2020 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2200 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2903 MHz versus 1860 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15383 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 947 versus 86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Environ 92% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 325.1 GTexel/s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 10752 versus 1792
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 versus 73128
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 versus 270.025
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 versus 20.735
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 versus 135.303
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 versus 1054.582
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 versus 20826
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 versus 20826
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 325.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10752 versus 1792 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 versus 73128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 versus 270.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 versus 20.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 versus 135.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 versus 1054.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 versus 20826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 versus 20826 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15383 | 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 947 | 86 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73128 | 193937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 735.8 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 58.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 178.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 2342.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 23142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 23142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4665 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Nom de code | Navi 23 | GA102 |
| Date de sortie | 8 Jun 2021 | 5 Oct 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | $4649 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 63 | 100 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2903 MHz | 1860 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2200 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 40.00 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 10752 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 208.3 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 325.1 GTexel/s | 625.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 11060 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 48 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W6600 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAA10G
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7600
