AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1975 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 6405.4x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 74 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 124927 vs 74175
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 13 November 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 74 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 124927 vs 74175 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 2786
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 2786
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 2243
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 2243
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 2243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 2243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 3347 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 124927 | 74175 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | Curacao |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 13 November 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | $179 |
| Place in performance rating | 493 | 501 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 74 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 210 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
| Width | Quad-slot | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
ATIFireGL V7200
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
ATIFireGL V5200
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4700 X2
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
