AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon RX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 4.6x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 2398
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 411
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 vs 14219
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 25.896
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 vs 486.804
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 2.503
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 53.111
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 100.658
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 2524
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 vs 3274
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 2524
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 vs 3274
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 2398 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 411 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 vs 14219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 vs 25.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 vs 486.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 vs 2.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 vs 53.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 vs 100.658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 vs 3274 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2398 | 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14219 | 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $169 |
Place in performance rating | 841 | 405 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
Stream Processors | 640 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |