AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon RX 570
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 und AMD Radeon RX 570 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 27 May 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3346 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 570
- Etwa 11% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1206-1244 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 4.6x mehr Texturfüllrate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 75% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 2398
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 411
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 vs 14219
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 25.896
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 vs 486.804
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 2.503
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 53.111
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 100.658
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 2524
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 vs 3274
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 2524
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 vs 3274
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 926-1168 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1206-1244 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 2398 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 411 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 vs 14219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 vs 25.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 vs 486.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 vs 2.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 vs 53.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 vs 100.658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 vs 3274 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2398 | 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14219 | 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Polaris | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | Lexa | Polaris 20 |
Startdatum | 27 May 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $199 | $169 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 841 | 405 |
Typ | Workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
Jetzt kaufen | $149.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1082 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 10 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 925 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
Stream Processors | 640 | 2048 |
Texturfüllrate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2200 million | 5,700 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Leitungssysteme | 2048 | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | Half Height | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 6.6" (168 mm) | 241 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 6-pin |
Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 96 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 4000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |