AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 250X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1053 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 38 GTexel / s
• Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
• Around 55% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,216 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 80 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 3.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1625 MHz
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2659 vs 2269
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.158 vs 32.22
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 vs 638.532
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.983 vs 2.963
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 vs 51.987
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.258 vs 151.963
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3358
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250X

• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 410
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3916 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2086
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3916 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2659 2269
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	410 637
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.158 32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	876.241 638.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.983 2.963
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.599 51.987
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.258 151.963
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3358

Compare specifications (specs)