AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 360
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1053 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 16225
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.158 vs 38.068
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 vs 819.203
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.983 vs 3.386
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 vs 58.285
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.258 vs 188.858
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3356
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops vs 1,613 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 vs 16225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 vs 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 vs 819.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 vs 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 vs 58.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 vs 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3091 vs 2528
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 420
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 vs 3301
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 2086
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 vs 3301
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 2086
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3091 vs 2528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 vs 420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 vs 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 vs 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 2086 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2528 | 3091 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | 513 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | 16225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | 819.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | 58.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Tobago |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 649 | 635 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $146.65 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,080 million |
Stream Processors | 768 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |