AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 360

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1053 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
  • Around 17% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 5.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 16225
  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.158 vs 38.068
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 vs 819.203
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.983 vs 3.386
  • Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 vs 58.285
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.258 vs 188.858
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3356
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3356
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 March 2017 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed 1053 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 58.97 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 896 vs 768
Floating-point performance 1,887 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 51217 vs 16225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.158 vs 38.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 876.241 vs 819.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.983 vs 3.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 64.599 vs 58.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 194.258 vs 188.858
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6466 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6466 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3091 vs 2528
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 420
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 vs 3301
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 2086
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 vs 3301
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 2086
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3091 vs 2528
PassMark - G2D Mark 513 vs 420
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4799 vs 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 4147 vs 2086
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4799 vs 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 4147 vs 2086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2528
3091
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
420
513
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
51217
16225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
46.158
38.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
876.241
819.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.983
3.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
64.599
58.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
194.258
188.858
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3301
4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2086
4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6466
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3301
4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2086
4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6466
3356
Name AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile AMD Radeon R7 360
PassMark - G3D Mark 2528 3091
PassMark - G2D Mark 420 513
Geekbench - OpenCL 51217 16225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.158 38.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 876.241 819.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.983 3.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 64.599 58.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 194.258 188.858
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3301 4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2086 4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6466 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3301 4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2086 4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6466 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1402

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile AMD Radeon R7 360

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Baffin Tobago
Launch date 1 March 2017 18 June 2015
Place in performance rating 649 635
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $109
Price now $146.65
Value for money (0-100) 29.24

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1053 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 1002 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,887 gflops 1,613 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 896 768
Texture fill rate 58.97 GTexel / s 50.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 2,080 million
Stream Processors 768

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 165 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.0 GB / s 112 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 1050 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)