AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 M280X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s
Around 5% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,792 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2659 vs 814
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 247
Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 41708
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3358
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3358

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 March 2017 vs 5 February 2015
Core clock speed	1002 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	58.97 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,887 gflops vs 1,792 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2659 vs 814
PassMark - G2D Mark	410 vs 247
Geekbench - OpenCL	51217 vs 41708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6466 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6466 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M280X

Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2086
Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2086

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713 vs 2086
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713 vs 2086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M280X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2659

814

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

410

247

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

51217

41708

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2086

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6466

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2086

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6466

3358

Name	AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 M280X
PassMark - G3D Mark	2659	814
PassMark - G2D Mark	410	247
Geekbench - OpenCL	51217	41708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	876.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	64.599
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	194.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2086	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6466	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2086	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6466	3358

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Baffin	Saturn
Launch date	1 March 2017	5 February 2015
Place in performance rating	662	665
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	1000 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,887 gflops	1,792 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	896	896
Texture fill rate	58.97 GTexel / s	56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	2,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		Not Listed
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	11
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB / s	88 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	Not Listed
Shared memory		0
Technologies
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore