AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs AMD FirePro R5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and AMD FirePro R5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5582 vs 2647
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 778 vs 625
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 vs 25 February 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops vs 1,267 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5582 vs 2647 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 vs 625 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro R5000
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 713 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1565
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1565
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 713 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 1565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 1565 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro R5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | AMD FirePro R5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5582 | 2647 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 | 625 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | AMD FirePro R5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 | 25 February 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $1,099 |
Place in performance rating | 470 | 402 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |