AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 705
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 3728.248
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 110.761
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3719
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3358
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3719
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 vs 13047
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 69530
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.203 vs 171.616
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.999 vs 16.925
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1370.281 vs 1195.863
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 13044
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 13044

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13047 15652
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	769 705
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	69530 105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.616 270.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4031.404 3728.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.925 26.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.788 110.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195.863 1370.281
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13044 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7164 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30936 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13044 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7164 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30936 3358

Compare specifications (specs)