AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

versus

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 versus 705
Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 versus 3728.248
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 versus 110.761
Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 versus 3719
9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 versus 3358
Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 versus 3719
9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 versus 3358

Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	769 versus 705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4031.404 versus 3728.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	247.788 versus 110.761
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7164 versus 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	30936 versus 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7164 versus 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	30936 versus 3358

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1200 MHz
Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1530 MHz
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 230 Watt
7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz
Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 versus 13047
Environ 51% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 69530
Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.203 versus 171.616
Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.999 versus 16.925
Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1370.281 versus 1195.863
Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 13044
Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 13044

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1620 MHz versus 1200 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1815 MHz versus 1530 MHz
Processus de fabrication	12 nm versus 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt versus 230 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	15652 versus 13047
Geekbench - OpenCL	105171 versus 69530
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	270.203 versus 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	26.999 versus 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1370.281 versus 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19811 versus 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19811 versus 13044

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13047

15652

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

769

705

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

69530

105171

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

171.616

270.203

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4031.404

3728.248

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.925

26.999

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

247.788

110.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1195.863

1370.281

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13044

19811

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7164

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30936

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13044

19811

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7164

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30936

3358

Nom	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark	13047	15652
PassMark - G2D Mark	769	705
Geekbench - OpenCL	69530	105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	171.616	270.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4031.404	3728.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.925	26.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	247.788	110.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1195.863	1370.281
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13044	19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7164	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	30936	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13044	19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7164	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	30936	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		10685

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Turing
Nom de code	Vega 10	TU104
Date de sortie	13 August 2018	13 August 2018
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$999	$2,299
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	120	138
Prix maintenant	$999
Genre	Workstation	Workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	13.37
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1530 MHz	1815 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1200 MHz	1620 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	230 Watt	200 Watt
Compte de transistor	12,500 million	13,600 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	4x mini-DisplayPort	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	267 mm	267 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Mémoire
Vitesse de mémoire	2000 MHz	14000 MHz