AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 1040.1x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 370 vs 323
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 1 February 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 vs 323 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- 10x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 4769
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 931 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 vs 4769 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 323 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4769 | 5918 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 22 | GP106B |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 1 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 301 | 533 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Compute performance | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 161.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 32.35 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s | 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5000 million | 4,400 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs
AMDRadeon 550
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600X
