AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7730M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7730M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 25 Watt
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7730M
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 512 vs 160
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1334 MHz
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3220 vs 1681
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3220 vs 1681
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3290
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1334 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3220 vs 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3220 vs 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7730M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7730M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1681 | 3220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1681 | 3220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3350 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 775 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.244 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.172 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.524 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.319 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.757 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1777 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1777 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7730M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Caicos | Chelsea |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1151 | 1154 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 1,500 million |
Boost clock speed | 675 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |