AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6770

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 3802
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 9.69

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770

• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 780 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 800 vs 320
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1262 vs 548
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 194
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 vs 162.886
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 vs 19.668
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 vs 77.819
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 vs 1119
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2279 vs 1284
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2264
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 vs 1119
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2279 vs 1284
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	548 1262
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 318
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4936 3802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 9.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.886 615.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.009 1.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.668 26.748
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.819 115.157
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3358

Compare specifications (specs)