AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 320 vs 80
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 37% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1310 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 548 vs 236
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2264 vs 558
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 vs 558
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs 30 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1310 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 548 vs 236 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 vs 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 vs 558 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4550
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 vs 194
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 vs 194 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 4550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 548 | 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 429 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.668 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 | 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 | 558 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 4550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Oland | RV710 |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | 30 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1406 | 800 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 10.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1310 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |