AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 83% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 3.1x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 320 vs 20
• 10x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 3210
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 8.844
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 10.385
• 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 12.361
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 988
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 988

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 780 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 548
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 194
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 162.886
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 1.009
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1284
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 2264
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1284
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 2264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	548 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4936 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.886 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.009 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.668 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.819 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2808

Compare specifications (specs)