AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 710M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 719 MHz
• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 96
• Around 68% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 546 vs 456
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 125
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4949 vs 2449
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 6.51
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.886 vs 148.156
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.009 vs 0.577
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 11.718
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 19.855
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 1030
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 1030

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 780 MHz
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1284
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2264
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1284
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	546 456
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 125
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4949 2449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 6.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.886 148.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.009 0.577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.668 11.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.819 19.855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 3075
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 3075
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3325

Compare specifications (specs)