AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 116 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1026 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 18.511
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 41.941

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 730 MHz
• Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 38% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 548
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 194
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 4936
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 vs 13.569
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 vs 162.886
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 vs 1.009
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 1119
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1284
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 2264
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 1119
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1284
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 2264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	548 1557
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4936 5750
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 18.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.886 354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.009 1.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.668 18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.819 41.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3322

Compare specifications (specs)