AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 640 MHz
• Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 96
• 2x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 548 vs 526
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 2100
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 5.617
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.009 vs 0.526
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 9.023
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 16.137
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 899
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1284 vs 1255
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2264 vs 2037
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 899
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 vs 1255
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 vs 2037

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 194
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 185.752 vs 162.886

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	548 526
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 232
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4936 2100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.886 185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.009 0.526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.668 9.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.819 16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2037
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2037

Compare specifications (specs)