AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
• Around 48% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4931 vs 1818
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 6.367
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.886 vs 118.389
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.009 vs 0.396
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 7.921
• 8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 9.393

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 730 MHz
• Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 728 vs 546
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 194
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1227 vs 1119
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1745 vs 1284
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1227 vs 1119
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1745 vs 1284

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	546 728
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 277
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4931 1818
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 6.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.886 118.389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.009 0.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.668 7.921
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.819 9.393
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2261

Compare specifications (specs)