AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and NVIDIA Quadro K3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R5 M335

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 706 MHz
Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 323

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 October 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1070 MHz vs 706 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	577 vs 323

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

2.1x more texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
Around 58% better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 684.8 gflops
2.9x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2271 vs 549
Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6314 vs 4157
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.239 vs 14.536
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 426.305 vs 120.354
3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 1080
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2502 vs 1114
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2616 vs 1716
3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3721 vs 1080
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2502 vs 1114
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2616 vs 1716

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	45.18 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 320
Floating-point performance	1,084 gflops vs 684.8 gflops
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2271 vs 549
Geekbench - OpenCL	6314 vs 4157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	19.239 vs 14.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	426.305 vs 120.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3721 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2502 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2616 vs 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3721 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2502 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2616 vs 1716

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

549

2271

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

577

323

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4157

6314

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.536

19.239

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

120.354

426.305

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1080

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1114

2502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1716

2616

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1080

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1114

2502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1716

2616

Name	AMD Radeon R5 M335	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	549	2271
PassMark - G2D Mark	577	323
Geekbench - OpenCL	4157	6314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.536	19.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	120.354	426.305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1080	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1114	2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1716	2616
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1080	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1114	2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1716	2616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		38.135
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 M335	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Exo	GK104
Design	AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date	21 October 2015	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	1045	1068
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,999
Price now		$1,999
Value for money (0-100)		1.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1070 MHz
Compute units	5
Core clock speed	1070 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	684.8 gflops	1,084 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	768
Texture fill rate	21.4 GTexel / s	45.18 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	3,540 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		75 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	12
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz	3200 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus