AMD Radeon R5 M335 versus NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M335 and NVIDIA Quadro K3100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M335
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 52% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1070 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 versus 323
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 October 2015 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1070 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 versus 323 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 45.18 GTexel / s versus 21.4 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 320
- Environ 58% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,084 gflops versus 684.8 gflops
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 4.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2271 versus 549
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6314 versus 4157
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.239 versus 14.536
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 426.305 versus 120.354
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 versus 1080
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2502 versus 1114
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2616 versus 1716
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3721 versus 1080
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2502 versus 1114
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2616 versus 1716
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 45.18 GTexel / s versus 21.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 320 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,084 gflops versus 684.8 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 versus 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6314 versus 4157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.239 versus 14.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 426.305 versus 120.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 versus 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2502 versus 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2616 versus 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3721 versus 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2502 versus 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2616 versus 1716 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 549 | 2271 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4157 | 6314 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | 19.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 | 426.305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 | 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1716 | 2616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 | 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1716 | 2616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.356 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.135 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Exo | GK104 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 21 October 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1045 | 1068 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Prix maintenant | $1,999 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.38 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1070 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 5 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1070 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 684.8 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.4 GTexel / s | 45.18 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1100 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |