AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI Radeon X1600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and ATI Radeon X1600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 6.1x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 2.54 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 18.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 903 vs 49
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 272 vs 209
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1019
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1019

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600

• Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	903 49
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	272 209
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 1019

Compare specifications (specs)