AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GRID K180Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and NVIDIA GRID K180Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 534
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 270 vs 113
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 1201
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1744
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2688
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 1201
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1744
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 28 June 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 vs 534 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 vs 113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 vs 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 vs 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K180Q
- Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1150 MHz
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 240 | NVIDIA GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 534 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 | 113 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 | 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 2688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 | 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 2688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 240 | NVIDIA GRID K180Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Oland | GK107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | $125 |
| Place in performance rating | 1256 | 1257 |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 192 |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 240 with others
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
ATIRadeon 9000
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7620G IGP
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
AMDRadeon 620
