AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 256
  • Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5091 vs 3061
  • Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 8.142
  • Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 262.321
  • Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.741
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 16.571
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 18.406
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 2207
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 2207
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 October 2013 vs 1 June 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 271 vs 256
Geekbench - OpenCL 5091 vs 3061
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.344 vs 8.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 290.632 vs 262.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.262 vs 0.741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.59 vs 16.571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 60.326 vs 18.406
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2342 vs 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2342 vs 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

  • Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
  • Around 15% better floating-point performance: 572.2 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
  • Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1150 MHz
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1013 vs 899
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1726 vs 1688
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1726 vs 1688
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 23.84 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 320
Floating-point performance 572.2 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1013 vs 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1726 vs 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1726 vs 1688

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
899
1013
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
271
256
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5091
3061
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13.344
8.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
290.632
262.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.262
0.741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21.59
16.571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
60.326
18.406
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1688
1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2342
2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1688
1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2342
2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3351
Name AMD Radeon R7 240 NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 899 1013
PassMark - G2D Mark 271 256
Geekbench - OpenCL 5091 3061
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.344 8.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 290.632 262.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.262 0.741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.59 16.571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 60.326 18.406
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1688 1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2342 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1688 1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2342 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 240 NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Oland GK107
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch date 8 October 2013 1 June 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $69 $265.27
Place in performance rating 1256 1258
Price now $49.99 $149.95
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 24.92 8.53

Technical info

Boost clock speed 780 MHz
Floating-point performance 499.2 gflops 572.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 384
Stream Processors 320
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s 23.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 55 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,270 million
Core clock speed 745 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-A (3.0)
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors N / A
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1150 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync