AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 497 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 899 vs 364
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 112
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5091 vs 1232
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1810
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1810
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 15 May 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz vs 497 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 899 vs 364 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 271 vs 112 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5091 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1810 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 240 | AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 899 | 364 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 271 | 112 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5091 | 1232 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 | 1810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 | 1810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 240 | AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Oland | Devastator |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
Place in performance rating | 1256 | 1259 |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 497 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,303 million |
Core clock speed | 360 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |