AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 850 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 9.373
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 0.906
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 27.022
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 48.793
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2673
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2799
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2673
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2799

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 22.4 GTexel / s
• 2.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 384
• Around 90% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 716.8 gflops
• 4.2x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1345 vs 1051
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 335 vs 283
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 vs 7525
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 459.025 vs 304.279
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2636 vs 2179
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2636 vs 2179

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1051 1345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	283 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7525 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.161 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	304.279 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.655 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.046 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	96.934 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2799

Compare specifications (specs)